BY RACHEL PAULK | JULY 5, 2008
Veterans are openly supporting McCain, as McCain himself happens to be a veteran (with a really moving POW experience).
http://veterans.johnmccain.com/Site.aspx
Feminists openly supported Hillary, as Hillary herself happened to be a ’she’ running for president (however much the frumpy clothes made some doubt).
http://www.feministsforhillary.com/
Mormons supported Romney, Bible-belt Christians supported Huckabee, etc etc.
(Note: I’m aware not ALL veterans are for McCain, not ALL feminists, mormons, christians, supported the above candidates. Just observing trends with MOST.)
So I’m asking to you to put the puzzle pieces together on the fact Obama has been openly endorsed by Hamas, the Communist Party, and allegedly the Black Panthers.
Listen to the Hamas endorsement: here.
See the Commie endorsement: here.
See the Black Panther endorsement: here.
The puzzle pieces don’t make a pretty picture.
















































3 responses so far ↓
SSG Kit Carson // July 6, 2008 at 9:47 pm
It is a gross error to assume even most veterans endorse McCain. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Once again Veterans and their attitudes are taken for granted. Veterans are fiscally conservative and socially liberal. And, if the present I-Dot in the White House has shown us anything it is that being a fighter pilot is a lousy predictor of presidential timber. Veterans are not vocal as a group, just some individuals are and they would like non-veterans to think they speak for us all…wrong answer. I would suggest no one take us foregranted and be so dismissive. It is a poor political strategy if it is used.
No Compromises // July 6, 2008 at 10:10 pm
I do welcome your comments, but they don’t make sense. You first state that veterens shouldn’t be taken for granted by assuming that they are for McCain simply because they are vets, but then you make the claim that veterens are fiscally conservative and socially liberal.
Aren’t you also taking veterens for granted by speaking for ALL of them when you make this claim?
Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that YOU are fiscally conservative and socially liberal? Wouldn’t it also be kind of smart to think about how ludicrious is it to say you are a fiscal conservative with socially liberal leanings when it takes a hell of a lot of money from tax payers to fund these stupid & assinine social policies?
Using the phrase “fiscal conservative” and “socially liberal” in the same sentence is like saying government intelligence! They simply do not mix! You ought to rethink your political stance and pick one.
There is no middle ground when it comes to calling yourself a fiscal conservative when you’re for social programs! These programs aren’t funded from the money tree in the back yard!
Debbie // July 7, 2008 at 3:20 pm
What is interesting this week, the liberal left seem to be upset with Obama for his flip-flopping. Very interesting.
Debbie Hamilton
Right Truth
Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.