Dear Reader,
This is a must read article, and I don’t want you to miss it so please click:
Please leave your comments on the new blog. Thank you for your patience while I transition to my new No Compromise blog
Kindest regards,
~No Compromise
Categories: Wordpress Political Blogs
Tagged: Conservative, Electoral College, Natural Born Citizen, News, Obama, Philip Berg, Politics, United States Supreme Court, Wordpress Political Blogs
No Compromise Radio! Right Radio for Right Listeners
In troubled times, the fearful & naive are always drawn to charismatic radicals.
Homeland stupidity threat:
Proud member of Conservatives First, a FeedBurner Network.
It’s Time to Take a Stand!
My blog is worth $264,898.67.
How much is your blog worth?
|
The Lasso of Truth
Blazing Cat Fur
Gates of Vienna
Vancouver Secrets
five feet of fury
Monkey in the Middle
Stingray
The Blog of Walker
My Two Cents Worth
Girl On The Right
Tundra Tabloids.......
Doctor Bulldog & Ronin
Dr Roy's Thoughts
Clear Conservative Thought
Man Of The Woods
TheOPINIONATOR
Vlad Tepes
Hark! The Chronicles of Islam
Right or Wrong Radio
Breath of the Beast
Brass Balls Radio
At Home in Hespeler
Free Canuckistan!
GayandRight
The New Zonka Blog
Mesopotamia West
The Silent Platform
Why the left isn't right
34 responses so far ↓
Ted // December 2, 2008 at 5:10 am
“Dirty Pool” at the Supreme Court apparently on behalf of Obama currently usurping YOUR Constitution: Leo Donofrio’s companion case, brought by Cort Wrotnowski, with fuller/better briefing showing Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen” reportedly has been sidetracked to the anthrax lab to deprive the full Court from seeing those filings in connection with Donofrio’s case this Friday, Dec 5, 2008. DO SOMETHING AMERICA!!!
Wayne // December 3, 2008 at 12:09 am
I’ve linked to and quoted your post in Barry Soetoro Watch on Jeremiah Films site.
richCares // December 5, 2008 at 2:21 pm
hey TED you are darn lucky that there is no ban on stupidity in the constitution
richCares // December 5, 2008 at 2:25 pm
look at Donfrio Docket, take note that Respondants Lawyers are not listed
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm
why is that?
hint: DISTRIBUTED for Conference doesn’t mean what you think it does!
richCares // December 5, 2008 at 2:29 pm
“anthrax lab to deprive the full Court from seeing those filings in connection with Donofrio’s case this Friday, Dec 5, 2008. DO SOMETHING AMERICA!!!”
see court link above, letter Received Dec 1, did not delay conferance, come on at least check things out ,before spouting nonsense! Is that too much to ask?
doctorbulldog // December 5, 2008 at 10:12 pm
reichCares,
Um… It WOULD have delayed the conference had Wrotnowski not discovered that it had been sent to the Anthrax lab. He personally hand delivered 10 copies to insure it would not be delayed. Not an easy task when you consider Mr. Wrotnowski was in Connecticut at the time he discovered this…
See article HERE
Once the copies were entered into the system, apparently, the original filing date of Nov. 29 was retroactively applied to the copies.
Cheers
richCares // December 5, 2008 at 10:43 pm
Just in, Supreme court will not hear Donfrio case, what’s next wingnuts?
“Um… It WOULD have delayed ”
I said it did not delay and it didn’t
anyway this segment is now over!
doctorbulldog // December 5, 2008 at 10:49 pm
reichCares,
One down, sixteen to go…
Cheers
doctorbulldog // December 5, 2008 at 11:02 pm
reichCares,
P.S. – Could you please provide a link, because the last thing I have found on the net says the full orders from the SCOTUS aren’t due until Monday December 8th, 2008.
Cheers
richCares // December 5, 2008 at 11:30 pm
only 2 cases were considered today Dec 5
you can see which 2 at courts blog site
Donfrio wasn’one of them
sorry, have a good weekend!
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/
doctorbulldog // December 5, 2008 at 11:33 pm
reichCares,
So, the Supreme Court is mum and we will have to wait until Monday…
Cheers
richCares // December 6, 2008 at 4:13 am
list of all conferences to be discussed by Supreme Court on 12/05 and 12/08
please carefully note NO DONOFRIO
repeat BO DONOFRIO
Got it?
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/petitions-to-watch-conferences-of-12508-121208/
doctorbulldog // December 6, 2008 at 4:33 am
reichCares,
The operative sentence is:
“…that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted.”
Like I said, the Supreme Court is remaining mum about this and we will have to wait until Monday. Until then, everything is just speculation.
Cheers
richCares // December 6, 2008 at 5:56 am
Cheers
no Donofrio,
“…that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted.” and no Donfrio listed, you don’t have to wait till Monday, the Donfrio case ist not any where on that list for 12/5 & 12/8
tell me when your bubble bursts on Monday as they do not discuss the case that is not listed OK and speculation says they may discuss a case not on the list!
double Cheers for lack of comprehension!
doctorbulldog // December 6, 2008 at 4:04 pm
reichCares,
Obviously you have me confused with someone who has all his/her hopes on this ONE case…
There will be no bursting of the proverbial bubble if the Supreme Court denies the stay.
But, if I were you, I wouldn’t get too comfortable…
Cheers
doctorbulldog // December 6, 2008 at 5:37 pm
There could be many reasons the Court didn’t issue its notice on Friday.
The most logical, whether the decision is for or against, would be that the Court is writing an opinion. The two orders handed down on Friday have no opinions attached. More than 90% of the cases SCOTUS looks at are denied certiorari.
The odds are against any case getting that far. But no more than that can be said.
Anything else is just guessing.
richCares // December 8, 2008 at 3:17 pm
08A407 DONOFRIO, LEO C. V. WELLS, NJ SEC. OF STATE
The application for stay addressed to Justice Thomas and
referred to the Court is denied.
doctorbulldog // December 8, 2008 at 3:35 pm
reichCares,
Thank you.
Cheers
patricksperry // December 8, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Well… If I am reading this correctly, then this issue is dead.
Think maybe the good folks at usasurvivor, prison planet, et al are onto something..?
richCares // December 8, 2008 at 5:03 pm
“We The People” foundation claiming that National Press Club will hold a meeting Dec 8 1:30 addressing the Donofrio court case, claiming that Donorio will be there to answer questions.
A few points
1. it is not a National Press Club Event, We The People merely rented a room and are portraying it as a National Press Club event to gain credibilty
2. Donofrio not part of it
Here’s Donofrio press release
*******************************************
DONOFRIO NOT INVOLVED WITH NATIONAL PRESS CLUB EVENT
ON DEC. 8, 2008
ALL REPORTS STATING I WILL BE AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB ON MON DECEMBER 8, 2008 ARE FALSE.
I will not be there and am not in any way associated with this event.
Please pass this information out to the blogosphere far and wide. The event has nothing to do with me.
World Net Daily has their story wrong. I am not involved and nobody is representing my case at this event.
*******************************************
A very A common statement is “World Net Daily has their story wrong”, no matter how often made, their readers still buy tin foils hats.
wearing a tin foil hat is an addiction, hard to break the habit
No Compromises // December 8, 2008 at 5:17 pm
Knock it off richhates!
Your saying that world net daily readers wear tin foil hats? Wow, that’s a leap. Anybody who watches the nightly news with Katie Couric wears tin foil hats. Anyone who religiously reads the Daily barf Kos and Alex Jones, listens to “progressive” radio, wears tin foils hats! I don’t know if WND has their story wrong, but I would hope that you would accuse the MSM of having 99% of their stories wrong!
The fact that they launched Obama’s presidential campaign for him, got him elected with their bias and soft ball questions–wait, they didn’t ask him any questions–ought to alarm you! Instead, you are jumping for joy when you should be concerned about the Goebbels style take over of the American press!
doctorbulldog // December 8, 2008 at 5:27 pm
The next case that has the best chance of being heard is Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State.
Given the long list of challenges lining up and the growing number of Americans who are doubting Obama’s right to the Presidency, it is odd that the Supreme Court doesn’t just do itself a favor and have a hearing in at least one of the cases. That way, they can rule in favor of Obama and wash their hands of the whole affair…
Perhaps the Donofrio case was just too cut and dry—in that Obama is clearly not a “natural-born citizen” as defined by the SCOTUS in 1939—so they are waiting for a case that is easier to rule against. Thus, eliminating the other cases that are pending…
As much as I hate to say it, the Berg case looks to be the easiest to rule against. So, if the SCOTUS decides to hear that one, we are in for a circle jerk…
Cheers
richCares // December 8, 2008 at 5:44 pm
“Knock it off richhates! ”
World Net Daily has been in the forefront of this issue claiming it’s a forgery
What about WND stating
“A separate WND investigation into Obama’s birth certificate utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren’t originally there”
Link to archived article
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=73214
after publishing this, their wingnut readers complained, they didn’t want to hear “authentic” so story was delete and WND went back to bashing the BC
is that good Christian ethics
explain this dear tin foil hat wearer!
richCares // December 8, 2008 at 6:03 pm
WND reported that Linda Lingle, Gov of Hawaii ordered Obama’s BC sealed, that was false, Lingle, a Republican, did no such thing. There are thousands of examples like this for you tin foil hat wearers. Keep believing!
No Compromises // December 8, 2008 at 6:05 pm
As usual richhates, you make inflammatory remarks never backing up anything you say with facts. Show me where
after publishing this, their wingnut readers complained,
“they didn’t want to hear “authentic” so story was delete and WND went back to bashing the BC”
Who is “they”? what christian ethics are you talking about? I’m sure you don’t care since you display none of your own.
richCares // December 8, 2008 at 6:35 pm
“Who is “they”? what christian ethics are you talking about? I’m sure you don’t care since you display none of your own.”
dear birgt intelligent person, please show where WND retracted their “it was authentic” story, would so nice if you did that instead of bleating nonsense, also show where they retracted Gov Lingle false story.
by the way did you like WND claiming BC was authentic? you don’t have to answer that, keep your self respect
doctorbulldog // December 8, 2008 at 6:43 pm
reichCares,
From the Honolulu Advertiser:
“Circuit Judge Bert Ayabe last month dismissed the suit filed in state court here, upholding arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that birth records are confidential under state law.”
Ordered BC sealed, or just kept the BC from being released? It’s all just semantic slicing; because in the end, it is unobtainable to anyone other than Obama or his immediate family…
Interestingly enough, Lingle (originally from Missouri—which Obama did not carry during the elections) was very critical of Obama’s claims to Hawaii…
Since NC’s SPAM filter likes to dump me if I have more than one link in a comment, I’ll link to that article in my next comment..
No Compromises // December 8, 2008 at 6:45 pm
hey troll,
if you don’t cool yourself you’re gonna get moderated. I haven’t made any claims about WND, you have. At this point, I don’t care what WND has or hasn’t done.
I’ve had it with your insults so self govern and stop with the insults. You can have any opinion you want, but when you insult others who disagree that’s when this blog bouncer steps in.
One more insult to any reader on this blog and you are out! Understand?
doctorbulldog // December 8, 2008 at 6:45 pm
CLICK HERE
Anyway, I just thought it was interesting…
Cheers
richCares // December 8, 2008 at 6:51 pm
doctorbulldog thanks for the link, many are not aware that Lind Lingle is a Republican and did not support Obama.
richCares // December 8, 2008 at 6:55 pm
I’ve had it with your insults
no insults were made, no sense coming back to a blog with your attitude
good bye (forever)
No Compromises // December 8, 2008 at 6:57 pm
goodbye rich. As a reminder check your very first comment. You had to start it off with insults! and you ended it with insults. People are sick and tired of those who disagree insulting those they are in disagreement with, why not just have a conversation about our disagreements and why and leave it at that? That is not a lot to ask for!
onna // December 8, 2008 at 7:30 pm
can you update your article, case was denied
The application for stay addressed to Justice Thomas and
referred to the Court is denied.
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/120808zor.pdf
No Compromises // December 8, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Onna, Plz click on the title of this blog and it will take you to the home page with updated articles. thanks. ~NC
Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.