Dear Reader,
This is a must read article, and I don’t want you to miss it so please click:
Barack Hussein Obama – Usurper-elect
Thank you for your patience while I transition to my new No Compromise blog
Kindest regards,
~No Compromise
Barack Hussein Obama – Usurper-elect
January 2, 2009 · 26 Comments
Categories: News · Politics · USA · War · Wordpress Political Blogs
Tagged: Constitutional Crisis, Faux-bama, Impostor, Manchurian Candidate, Natural Born Citizen, Obama Fraud, U.S. Constitution, Usurper-elect
26 responses so far ↓
Ted // January 2, 2009 at 1:08 am
MESSAGE TO EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS:
When counting the electoral votes, either Congress finds by 1/8/09 that Obama, not being an Article II “natural born citizen”, fails to qualify as President whereupon Biden becomes the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) or thereafter defers to the Supreme Court to enjoin Obama’s inauguration with Biden becoming only Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President is duly determined.
The preferable choice, at least for the Democrats, should seem obvious.
Jefferson Paine // January 2, 2009 at 1:39 am
Ted,
Very clever conclusion, but doesn’t your conslusion depend on actually following the U.S. Constitution? Isn’t it safe to say that that’s the one scenario that’s least likely to occur in this case?
captain trips // January 2, 2009 at 1:57 am
I beleive (in hopes that I’m wrong) that “barry” will become the president in SPITE of the legal and constitutional problems. The courts will ignore or even laugh OFF these legal challenges as “ridiculous” or “outrageous.” They’ll repeat the “no standing” argument and all will be well.
Until the people finally realize they’ve been screwed. … yeah that might be a long long time from now. We’re more worried about our mortgages, our overdrawn credit cards our football our porn and our medical marijuana. We’re more concerned about letting sexually confused sickos “marry” another person of the same sex. We’re more concerned with providing those poor illegal immigrants drivers licenses, welfare, medical attention, jobs and amnesty. On and on and on. Our attention has been so diverted and buried under garbage …. I’m not sure ANYTHING is really going to be done about this.
We’re all probably “barking at the fucking moon.”
Patrick Sperry // January 2, 2009 at 4:01 am
Moon barking aside, my bet, is that the Black Crows will find a way to duck the issue. I have no faith in them at all when it comes to really important things. Take the case before them now dealing with firearm ownership by someone convicted of a less than felony. Sure, that particular part of that law might get over turned, but, them trashing all of the ex post facto laws that have been passed in recent times? They will stick their collective heads in the sand.
I recently posted about my top 10 predictions for 2009, and most of the problems that I listed can be traced back to the Supreme Court in one way or another.
captain trips // January 2, 2009 at 8:54 pm
It’s funny kind of . . . and kind of not.
What you say reminds me of the chapter title in one of the books I read awhile back. The chapter was titled, “Supreme Sodomy.”
It seems, to me at least, that the so called supremes are no longer UNDER the “checks and balances” that is supposedly built into our system of Govt.
How did this happen ?
Why has it been allowed to continue unchecked ?
letholdus // January 3, 2009 at 6:04 am
Visualize the Democrat voting electorate, like a herd of cattle, they are grossly unintelligent, possessing enough presence of mind to eat, drink, sleep, and reproduce and let’s not forget their most developed skill-following the herd. They lack enough self awareness to realize that , a) they are in this situation, and b)it is the result of years of active effort by the Democrat party and it’s union lackeys to convert our schools from institutions of learning to institutions of brain-washing and indoctrination. After all, we wouldn’t want a bunch of facts to get in the way of an election. So first thing in the morning when all you cows still don’t realize that the stench is you, go out once again and vote for the very people that have made you into the useful idiots that you are. You don’t know history, you don’t understand the Constitution , you don’t have the slightest clue about why it is important to not be so filled with hatred that you fail to properly investigate the qualifications of your own candidate. Oops!
Educated men are as much superior to uneducated men as the living are to the dead.
—Aristotle, 384–322 B.C.2
captain trips // January 3, 2009 at 11:19 pm
“Let,”
I would have added one word to what you said is all. A strategically placed “only” in this line
Visualize the Democrat voting electorate, like a herd of cattle, they are grossly unintelligent, possessing [ right here ] enough presence of mind to eat, drink, sleep, and reproduce and let’s not forget their most developed skill-following the herd. ……….
captain trips // January 3, 2009 at 11:21 pm
All in all though, you’ve made the call pretty accurately I’d have to say.
Lynn Green // January 4, 2009 at 5:55 am
Keep it up. The more you harp on this, the more you discredit the far right cause you represent.
Jefferson Paine // January 4, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Hi Lynn,
Whatever “far-right cause” are you talking about? Sadly, because of the power-grubbing, ignorant, and brain-dead sheeple, obeying the U.S. Constitution has become a far-right cause. Can you prove that BHO was born to U.S. Citizens upon U.S. soil? [crickets chirping..]
captain trips // January 5, 2009 at 1:40 am
Oooh oooohh yeah. You’re exactly right. No one should SAY anything about something like this. It just “discredits” them LOL – rolls eyes –
What a strange attitude to have – shrugs –
==============
Lynn Green // January 4, 2009 at 5:55 am
Keep it up. The more you harp on this, the more you discredit the far right cause you represent.
Adam // January 5, 2009 at 2:08 pm
If breathing wasn’t an involuntary muscle response Barach-opods would suffocate. It is hard to imagine being to stupid to breathe but after months of ignoring the Obama BC issue it has become evident. This is not going away. It will either be resolved in the court room where it should be or in the streets where the conservatives have the decided advantage.
Patrick Sperry // January 6, 2009 at 3:46 pm
I think that it is sad that being an American, and supporting the Constitution and Bill of Rights is now considered to be “far right.”
It may only be my opinion, but I happen to think that the issue isn’t either far right, or far left. I think it is simply being an American.
Ted // January 10, 2009 at 8:55 pm
The nation owes more than thanks to three unlikely modern day patriots: professional poker player, musician, and retired attorney, Leo Donofrio; life long Democrat and former Pennsylvania assistant attorney general, Phil Berg; and Soviet emigree and attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz (she’s also a dentist).
While Mr. Donofrio painstakingly established the airtight case that BHO could not be an Article II “natural born citizen” (at BHO’s birth, dad was British/Kenyan, not American, citizen) Leo’s Stay of the 12/15/08 electoral college vote was denied by SCOTUS as procedurally unripe.
Nevertheless, since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress’ count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama’s eligibility issue over to Congress — rendering moot the Berg and Taitz (Lightfoot) cases — Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the Friday 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama’s failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg’s request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference Friday 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case Friday 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.
Now that BHO is in checkmate and cannot be POTUS, he can be a patriot as well. He need not subject the nation to the expense and trauma of requiring SCOTUS to overrule his ‘Presidency’. BHO can and should voluntarily step down with Biden becoming Acting POTUS under the 20th Amendment, and under the agreement all potential claims by the Government for itself and on behalf of others against BHO are released.
gaetano // January 15, 2009 at 11:03 am
I am sick,sick, sick, of obamma this and obamma that.I just can`t believe that anyone ,wether you hate Bush,or repubs,or blacks or any other color,could ever vote for a person, that you don`t even know what he real fu%%%%%%% name is.He has more names then half the prisners in the U.S.. There is no trust in this election or will there ever be again.Our government and our way of life has been lost and gone ever since that sex maniac bill clinton show up with his big, red , coke covered nose.Since when did the people of our country let anybody that does drugs and admitts to it run for and then elect this assho%%.What a great example for our children to live by. I know this country is gone forever and when I am fighting for my last breath,protecting my family,and the innocent,I only hope that some of the people that have put us in this situation are near me so I could spit in their face befor I die.People are never satisfied with just life anymore.You are nothing but animals with animal instincs.
Ted // January 16, 2009 at 8:52 am
The current SCOTUS threshold for a MUST STAY of BHO’s inauguration is not whether he is ultimately determined constitutionally ineligible to be POTUS, merely whether there now is SERIOUS QUESTION on his constitutional eligibility, since any determination of inelligibility AFTER inauguration would pose unnecessary civil and military difficulties.
Dr. Conspiracy // January 17, 2009 at 3:42 am
Sarah Obama is Barack Sr’s. step mother, not his mother.
Ted // January 18, 2009 at 9:16 pm
The question is not IF there will be an interdiction of Obama’s Presidency by the Supreme Court, the questions are WHEN and HOW that interdiction will transpire — that is, if the USA is to continue as the Constitutional Republic that now exists.
Phyllis Kunz // January 19, 2009 at 6:57 pm
IT IS MY OPINION THAT CHIEF
JUSTICE ROBERTS SHOULD NOT
SWEAR IN OBAMA UNTIL THE
BIRTH CERTIFICAE ISSUE IS
RESOLVED AND POSTPONE IT
UNTIL TUESDAY AFTER THE
1/23/09 MEETING.
American with a heartache // January 21, 2009 at 12:37 am
My heart ached today during the inauguration. I am beyond sad that our nation no longer respects or upholds the Constitution. I do not understand why Obama has been permitted to become President without being a natural born citizen. Is there nobody to stop him? We must all pray for our nation and hope that the SCOTUS will do the job of defending the Constitution that they have been entrusted with. My brother-in-law basically says it’s a lost cause — we have to support Obama now that he’s President. But how can I respect someone who has been caught in so many deceptions and lies?
Lori Stacey // January 22, 2009 at 7:08 am
Your assumptions and reasoning regarding McCain’s eligibility is completely incorrect.
1. McCain lied about where he was born also. In a case brought against him in NH back in June, the attorney involved got his birth certificate that McCain ALSO would not produce. Any news reports contrary are pure lies. The hospital he claimed to be born at was not even BUILT until 5 years AFTER he was born.
2. He was actually born in the REPUBLIC of Panama, city of Colon which was not at the Naval Base that he lied about. It does not matter anyway because even at the Naval Base he would NOT qualify.
3. The Panama Canal Zone was NEVER US Territory anyway! It was merely leased for water rights by treaty. He was NOT born in the US or any of its territories AND he was born in the Republic of Panama which was subject to completely different immigration laws than in the Canal Zone specifically that he claimed.
Either way, he was STILL NOT eligible to run for President and the press did not want this real story either, believe me I tried just as hard against him because I am a Constitutionalist NOT a party loyalist.
The next case against Obama hits the US Supreme Court on Friday the 23rd and is the strongest of all of them to hit the Supreme Court so far because the Plaintiff, Gail Lightfoot was a VP candidate on the ballot in CA, so she has legal standing that all the rest were thrown out because of. Her attorney also is handling the Alan Keyes which is yet another separate case. The best thing is that this attorney Dr. Orly Taitz knows that McCain is not eligible either as we need to correct BOTH of these wrongs or nothing will ever be right.
Lori Stacey
Ted // January 23, 2009 at 5:03 am
Take the test.
FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?
ANSWER: Joe Biden
Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)
This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.
SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?
ANSWER: Hillary Clinton
One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.
THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?
ANSWER: Yet undetermined.
Adam // January 23, 2009 at 12:09 pm
I was once a PR Director for a well know rock musician. I saw the same glazed over look on the faces of the Barach-opods as I did on the worshipping faces of the fans. They were so mezmerized that they were completely unable to gather their senses. Rather disturbing I might add. Obama is a usurper and will never be my president nor the president of millions of other patriots. The man is an irresponsible crook. Here is a guy who spent over a million dollars to conceal a twelve dollar BC and I am suppose to trust him with the federal budget? Uhh! I don’t think so.
captain trips // January 23, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution reads:
“no person except a natural born citizen, OR a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president.”
He DOES fit that doesn’t he ? He IS a “citizen of the United States” right ?
What am I missing ?
ThoughtRogue // January 24, 2009 at 1:52 am
Thanks Lori,
I have never heard any of the “facts” you state regarding McCain’s eligibility. IF they are true, I agree with your basic conclusion. Our President, from whatever party, or no party, needs to be duly Constitutionally qualified.
What was that thing that I believe Congress passed before the election regarding McCain’s eligibility – which BHO not only signed but reportedly “co-authored” – which deemed McCain’s candidacy as kosher??
Was it illegitimate? Does it have ANY enforceability (for McCain)? What about if Amendment XX comes into play – doesn’t Congress have their say to resolve the new President? How?
Ted // January 31, 2009 at 8:55 pm
The Joint Chiefs of Staff HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to stand behind Guantanamo Military Judge James Pohl UNTIL OBAMA OVERCOMES “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” BY SUPPLYING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PROVING HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION.
Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.