Tag Archive: Treasonous Senators

Barney Frank Takes the Lead

Dear Reader,

This is a must read article, and you don’t want to miss seeing Barney’s NASCAR suit, so please click:

Barney Frank Takes the Lead

Thank you for your patience while I transition to my new No Compromise blog

Kindest regards,

~No Compromise


Stop the Bailout for Planned Parenthood

Abortion groups have submitted their 50 page proposal to the Obama-Biden transition team. At the top of the list? More taxpayer dollars for abortion organizations like Planned Parenthood. How much more? Over 1.5 billion dollars more!

Who will be next to ask for tax dollars? NAMBLA?

Who will be next to ask for tax dollars? NAMBLA?

The Abortion Bailout Package:

  • $1 BILLION dollars in taxpayer funding for International Abortion Groups
  • $700 million in taxpayer funding for “Title X” Health Clinics (aka your local Planned Parenthood affiliate)
  • $65 million for the UNFPA, an international aid organization connected to coercive abortion as part of China’s coercive one-child policy
  • Repeal the Hyde Amendment – Vastly expanding federal taxpayer funding for abortions
  • Include Abortion coverage in any taxpayer-subsidized national health care program
  • Expand taxpayer-funded abortions on military bases
  • Expand taxpayer-funded abortions through the Peace Corps program
  • Expand taxpayer-funded abortions for federal prisoners

Send a letter to your Senators today demanding that they keep your tax dollars out of the pockets of abortion providers.

Take Action Here

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

by Natrual Born Citizen

My application was denied.  The Honorable Court chose not to state why.

Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State is still pending as an emergency application resubmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of last Tuesday.  I worked extensively on that application and it includes a more solid brief and a less treacherous lower Court procedural history.

After six days, it’s interesting that Scalia neither denied it nor referred it to the full Court.

My case may have suffered from the NJ Appellate Division Judge having incorrectly characterized my original suit as a “motion for leave to appeal” rather than the “direct appeal” that it actually was.  On Nov 21 I filed official Judicial misconduct charges with the NJ Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, and I updated  SCOTUS about that by a letter which is part of SCOTUS Docket as of Nov. 22.  The NJ Appellate Divison official case file is fraudulent.

On the chance that SCOTUS was looking at both my case and Cort’s case, I must stress that Cort’s case does not have the same procedural hang up that mine does.   It may be that without a decision on the Judicial misconduct allegation correcting the NJ Appellate Division case file, SCOTUS might have been in the position of not being able to hear my case as it would appear that my case was not before them on the proper procedural grounds.

I did file a direct appeal under the proper NJ Court rules, but the lower Court judge refused to acknowledge that and if his fraudulent docketing was used by SCOTUS they would have a solid procedural basis to throw mine out.

I don’t know if it’s significant that Cort’s case was not denied at the same time as mine.  His case argues the same exact theory – that Obama is not a natural born citizen because he was a British citizen at birth.

All eyes should now be closely watching US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A469, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.

If Cort’s application is also denied then the fat lady can sing.  Until then, the same exact issue is before SCOTUS as was in my case.  Cort’s application before SCOTUS incorporates all of the arguments and law in mine, but we improved on the arguments in Cort’s quite a bit as we had more time to prepare it.

I was in a rush to get mine to SCOTUS before election day, which I did do on Nov. 3.

Cort’s case has a much cleaner lower court procedural history.

I’m not trying to play with people’s minds here.  SCOTUS has not updated Cort’s docket and until they do there can be no closure.  I was expecting, if they didn’t grant certiorari, that they would deny both cases at the same time so as to provide closure to the underlying issue.  I hate to read tea leaves, but Cort’s application is still pending.  That’s all we can really say with any certainty.

Dear Reader,

This is a must read article, and I don’t want you to miss it so please click:

AIG Offers First Takaful Homeowners Insurance Product for U.S

Thank you for your patience while I transition to my new No Compromise blog

Kindest regards,

~No Compromise

Dear Reader,

This is a must read article, and I don’t want you to miss it so please click:

 Thomas Breaks Custom: Forces Supreme Court to Look at Obama Citizenship Case

Please leave your comments on the new blog.  Thank you for your patience while I transition to my new No Compromise blog

Kindest regards,

~No Compromise

Dear Reader,

This is a must read article, and I don’t want you to miss it so please click:

Shocker: Why Obama WILL NOT Be President in January

Please leave your comments on the new blog.  Thank you for your patience while I transition to my new No Compromise blog

Kindest regards,

~No Compromise

NC Quizzes:  Has Horowitz lost his freakin’ marbles???

by David Horowitz

Conservatives need to get a grip. My email box is full of right wing trash talk (sorry, I’m peeved this morning) about Obama’s fake birth certificate, his alleged covert Islamism and Hillary’s scandals. Worse, we were running a frontpage story on this last wild goose until I canned it. 

Conservatives need to get a grip? okay, that sounds original Dave.  

Since not everybody is following me at this point, let’s take them one at a time. First, the birth certificate. Is Obama a legitimate president of the United States? Well, let me put it to you this way: 64 million Americans voted to elect Barack Obama. Do you want to disenfranchise them? Do you think it’s possible to disenfranchise 64 million Americans and keep the country? And please don’t write me about the Constitution. The first principle of the Constitution is that the people are sovereign. What the people say, goes. If you think about it, I think you will agree that a two-year billion dollar election through all 50 states is as authoritative a verdict on anything as we are likely to get. Barack Obama is our president. Get used to it.

I can’t believe it!   Let me get this straight:  Obama wipes his butt with the Constitution which creates the very office Obama seeks to commandeer, and let me remind you–men died for,  and we are suppose to choose peace over not offending 64 million people who were hypnotized into voting for this 2-bit lawyer with no experience using Saul Alinksy tactics who consorts with anti-American terrorists?  Peace no matter what?  Is that what you’re saying,  Horowitz?  I guess if Obama was 18 and got 64 million votes it shouldn’t matter,  right? That’s what you’re arguing!  

And what could conservatives be thinking when they push this issue as though it were important (as The American Thinker did last week)? Do we want to go challenging the legitimacy of an election that involved 120 million voters?

I can’t believe what I’m hearing Horowitz saying here!  If it’s wrong, it’s wrong.  PERIOD!  What’s more important?  Our Constitution or a lie and the end result of someone being offended?  I thought Presidents were the Chief Law Enforcers?  Not the Chief Law Breakers.  

Have we become deranged leftists like Al Gore who would attack the one binding thread that makes us a nation despite our differences?

What is this binding thread? If it’s not the Constitution,  then what is it?  It sure isn’t the Bill of Rights anymore because we have passed laws threatening fines and jail time for those who say the wrong thing, forgive me, I mean think the wrong thing! 

The mystique of elections is the American covenant.

No it isn’t David Horowitz!!!  You ought to know better than that.  We aren’t stupid,  and majority rule is not the binding thread!!  What the hell are you talking about? Have you lost your mind?  You will not find the word Democracy,  NOT ONCE,  in any founding document.

I will not “just get over” seeing the violation of that document,  not for Obama, not for your fear of civil war, not for fear of a secession, not anything!  

Respect it. Barack Obama is the president of the United States. Get used to it.

He is NOT the president of these united States UNTIL those electors vote,  and that will happen after the Supreme Court ensures that he is QUALIFIED to take that seat!  We now have to take this route since the DNC and the media REFUSED to vet him properly by asking tough questions and doing their homework.  Did you ask the tough questions, Horowitz?  If so, what answers did you get back?  crickets chirping

I’m not even going to go into the Hussein idiocy. Obama spent 20 years in Reverend Wright’s Trinity Church. There is much that was wrong with that, but being a Muslim isn’t one of them.

Not to you maybe, but it is something to the muzzies of the world.  I have a question for you Dave,  what would you be called if you had a muzzie daddy,  and went to a muzzie school,  and then just decided you weren’t muzzie anymore?  Would Islam just release you from your obligation with the snap of a finger?  

And the Hillary thing. Get real. Please. Obama was elected in large part by a leftist crusade for hope and CHANGE. Now, as president-elect he has just formed the most conservative foreign policy team since John F. Kennedy, one well to the right of Bill Clinton. Where is your gratitude for that? What is more relevant in his Hillary Clinton pick — her prickly past or the fact that except for Joe Lieberman, she is the Democrat most identified with support for the Iraq War? 

Oh, yes, Hill can be so trusted!  The socialized health care queen. How about Daschel,  Mr. Pro-abort himself, and Rahm baby!  Yeah, he’s great. We’ll see how this so called conservative team works out.  
Perhaps I should repeat that. Hillary Clinton is the Democrat MOST IDENTIFIED WITH REMOVING SADDAM HUSSEIN BY FORCE. She lost a presidency over it. So whatever low opinion you may have about Hillary, on foreign policy she is the very best choice for that position that conservatives could expect to get. Even better, because the ONLY issue that really divided Hillary and Obama was the Iraq War. So this is President Obama’s way of saying, ok now that I’m in office I’m going to put my anti-war commitments aside and put the defense of the country first. And in case you didn’t get that, I’m going to keep George Bush’s Secretary of Defense in place, and I’m going to appoint a conservative Marine general as my National Security Advisor.

This is like smoking the bees to pacify them,  David.  Horowitz, none of this matters if he is unqualified to serve because he is an illegal.  He knows the conservatives are hot on his trail and can it be that he thinks this is the way to quiet us down?  
Maybe some conservatives out there have forgotten, but Clinton’s Secretary of Defense Les Aspin was an anti-Vietnam activist. So were his two National Security Advisers, Tony Lake and Sandy Berger. In fact they met Clinton in the anti-war movement. Conservatives should be cheering right now, not chasing red herrings.

And let me remind you David, that Obama’s campaign started in Bill Ayer’s living room. Remember Bill Ayers? Domestic terrorist?  Let’s see,  anti-war activists verses actual domestic terrorists–What weighs heavier in the balance, David?

You are blaming conservatives for what is going on right now. This is not the fault of conservatives, it is solely the fault of Obama and Obama alone, NOT conservatives. It’s not even his enabler’s fault.

 If he would produce the original genuine vault certificate of his birth all of this would go away.  The fact that he hasn’t should alarm the crap out of you. The fact that he spent one million dollars hiding it should alarm you. The fact that he went to Hawaii to get it selaed should send shivers up and down your spine.  The fact that the certification on the factcheck website is a forgery should send you to the sheriff’s office seeking a warrant for his arrest because it is a felony.

What about the passport he used when he illegally went to Pakistan?  How about the fact that he was in Kenya trying to over throw a legally held political seat filled with a pro-american for his cousin Odinga the Marxist and Islamic sympathizer.  What about the fact that his draft registration is a forgery, another felony?  

But instead, you blame the conservatives.  Obama is to blame and only him!    Not the conservatives who care for our American fabric, and culture, our Constitution,  and understand what it means to have an unbending SPINE!  Don’t you dare give this blame-shifting narcissist a pass on these critical constitutional questions!  Don’t make excuses,  and don’t brush it off!  

I understand your motive for wanting to shift blame.  You want to avoid a civil war,  but it doesn’t work that way!  You want to keep the peace, but at what price and for how long?  There is only one way to make it go away,  and only Obama can make it happen. If he refuses,  I am resisting him, I will never acknowledge him as a legitimate president as he has wiped his ass with a document MY forefathers shed their blood,  and let me repeat,  the document that actually creates the seat he desires at all costs!  

Your forefathers may not have shed their blood for our Independence,  but I have family members who died for this country!   But who cares right?  Anything for peace!   

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.  ~  Ben Franklin

Supremes to review Barack’s citizenship

by Bob Unruh

A case that challenges President-elect Barack Obama’s name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has been scheduled for a “conference” at the U.S. Supreme Court.

NC Sez:  This is an interesting development

Conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. This case is set for a conference Dec. 5, just 10 days before the Electoral College is scheduled to meet to make formal the election of Obama as the nation’s next president.

NC states:  I have no faith in any branch of government to make the Right choice for America.  The question has been raised and the question must have an answer.

The Supreme Court’s website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the secretary of state in New Jersey, over not only Obama’s name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero.

The case, unsuccessful at the state level, had been submitted to Justice David Souter, who rejected it. The case then was resubmitted to Justice Clarence Thomas. The next line on the court’s docket says: “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.”

NC exclaims:  I like this guy, Donofrio!  He didn’t give up!  



If four of the nine justices vote to hear the case in full, oral argument may be scheduled.

The action questions whether any of the three candidates is qualified under the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural-born citizen.”

NC Sez:  This is an important question and we know that the obamunist doesn’t give two rips for the Constitution. If he did he would have provided his legitimate birth certificate and shut down this issue months ago!  

According to America’s Right blogger Jeff Schreiber, there also was a development in a second case presented to the Supreme Court on the same issue.

His report said the Federal Election Commission now has waived its right to respond to a complaint brought by attorney Philip Berg.



“There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond. First, because the court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg’s petition getting denied. Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg’s lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response,” the blogger speculated.

NC points out: In a postmodern and emotional resolve,  the FEC could be basing their decision on NOT taking the allegations seriously?  Ya ses, this is exactly why this country fails:  the bureaucraps make decisions based on their fears, laziness, lack of intelligence etc.  Scary people,  very scary!  

“Another thing which is not completely clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents,” he added.

“If it were just the FEC filing the waiver, I must say that I’m surprised,” Berg told America’s Right. “I’m surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us. I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn’t seem to exist.

NC Sez:  Exactly,  the question has been asked and it needs an answer, not just swept under the rug! 

“However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion,” he said, noting that the attorney from the Solicitor General’s office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.

NC Sez:  Amen, my liberal friend!  

But he noted that “questions surrounding this aspect of Obama’s candidacy are seemingly beginning to see the light of day.”

NC wishes:  We could hope I guess, but again, I have no trust in my government anymore!  

Just last week, WND reported on worries over a “constitutional crisis” that could be looming over the issue of Obama’s citizenship.

NC reminds:  We have cause to worry because the obamunist REFUSES to show us his true and legitimate birth certificate (NOT certificate of live birth. It’s obvious he was born–duh!) and until he does that behavior only serves to cause more confusion and concern as it should! 

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others filed a court petition in California asking the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state’s 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office.

Alan Keyes
Alan Keyes

The disputes all cite “natural-born citizen” requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

NC points out:  Haven’t you people learned yet that when you are dealign with corrupt and treasonous individuals, I mean groups, that the fact there is a reality doesn’t actually mean you have to admit there is a reality and live like there is a reality?  It wouldn’t surprise me one bit that the obamunist is so out of touch with reality that he thinks all he has to do is ignore this question because it will just go away, in his mind?  Giving the fact that most of our government in run by real life fools that he just might be right!  

The governor’s office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

NC States:  The Constitution states that one MUST BE a natural born US Citizen to BE POTUS.  That means if the question arises that you are not a Citizen then you MUST PROVE you are one to hold this office!   Why will he not release his birth certificate?  

Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject.

The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundationon behalf of Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors.

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,” the action challenges.

NC points out: Not to mention that he will have access to state secrets that could harm our country should it be discovered that this flaming marxist is illegal

An Obama spokesman interviewed by WND described such lawsuits as “garbage.”

The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote, when it is held in December, by a 2-to-1 margin.

NC quizzes:  Now this raises another question:  Do you actually trust our election process anymore with ACORN running around registering tens of thousands of fake voters in key battle ground states? Geez, people you can’t actually believe that this election was really on the up and up! Marxists love that corruption.  It’s the only way they can win.  They certainly can’t win on the truth of what they actually stand for so they MUST redefine every word in the english language and every political philosophy they believe in.  

The California case states, “There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process,” the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

“Since [the secretary of state] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a ‘natural born’ citizen of the United States of America is received by her,” the document said.

“This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports withimmigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.

The “certificate of live birth” posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges.

“Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence,” the document said. “The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama’s original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.”

The case also raises the circumstances of Obama’s time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama’s mother having given up his U.S. citizenship.

NC sez:  This question has to be answered.  Did she or didn’t she.  She hated America as most Marxists do so it wouldn’t surprise me if she did give up her American citizenship! 

Any subsequent U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be “naturalized,” not “natural-born.”

WND has reported other challenges that have been raised in Ohio, Connecticut, Washington, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Hawaii.

Hat Tip to Bulldog