Tag Archive: Western Civilization

Human Achievement Hour!

UPDATE:  Al Gore Leaves The Light On For Ya.  Remember because he’s special he doesn’t have to comply with his own demands! 

Recently,  I posted a piece regarding the loons in Hollyweird wanting everyone, worldwide,  to turn off all their lights for one hour.  Tell that to the people who wish they had the electricity these loons have in their lives! 

Well I say, turn on ALL your lights at 8:30 pm local time to celebrate human achievement and advancement because of electricity!  Where would this world be without electricity and all that has done to advance humanity? Hooray for Electricity!  images-15

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Human Achievement Hour! “, posted with vodpod

Celebrate Electricity! 

Don’t be left in the dark! 


And here is something for you Washingtonians: Roll on Columbia, Roll On!  


NC reminds:  Mr. Hamid was interviewed on No Compromise Radio which you can listen to here

by Tawfik Hamid

The film “Fitna” by Dutch parliament member Geert Wilders has created an uproar around the world as it linked violence committed by Islamists to Islam.

Many commentators and politicians — including the British government, which denied him entry to the country last month — reflexively accused Mr. Wilders of inciting hatred. The question, however, is whether the blame is with Mr. Wilders, who simply exposed Islamic radicalism, or with those who promote and engage in this religious extremism. In other words, shall we fault Mr. Wilders for showing photos of the hanging of homosexuals, or shall we fault those who actually promote and practice this crime?

There is a certain schizophrenia among many Muslims who seem to believe that it is acceptable to teach hatred and violence in the name of their religion, while at the same time expecting the world to respect Islam as “a religion of peace, love and harmony.”

Scholars in the most prestigious Islamic institutes and universities continue to teach things like Jews are “pigs and monkeys,” that women and men must be stoned to death for adultery, or that Muslims must fight the world to spread their religion. Isn’t, then, Mr. Wilders’s criticism appropriate? Instead of blaming him, we must blame the leading Islamic scholars for having failed to produce an authoritative book on Islamic jurisprudence that is accepted in the Islamic world and unambiguously rejects these violent teachings.

While many religious texts preach violence, the interpretation, modern usage and implementation of these teachings make all the difference. For example, the stoning of women exists in both the Old Testament and in the Islamic tradition, or “Sunna” — the recorded deeds and manners of the prophet Muhammad. The difference, though, is that leading Jewish scholars agreed to discontinue these practices centuries ago while Muslim scholars have yet to do so. Hence we do not see the stoning of women practiced or promoted in Israel, the “Jewish” state, but we see it practiced and promoted in Iran and Saudi Arabia, the “Islamic” states!

When the British government banned Geert Wilders from entering the country to present his film in the House of Lords, it made two egregious errors. The first was to suppress free speech, a canon of the civilized Western world. The second mistake was to blame the messenger — punishing, so to speak, the witness who exposed the crime instead of punishing the criminal. Mr. Wilders did not produce the content of the violent Islamic message he showed in his film — the Islamic world did that. Until the Islamic clerical establishment takes concrete steps to reject violence in the name of their religion, Mr. Wilders criticism is not only permissible as “controversial” free speech but justified.

So, Islamic scholars and clerics, it is up to you to produce a Shariah book that will be accepted in the Islamic world and that teaches that Jews are not pigs and monkeys, and that declaring war to spread Islam is unacceptable, and killing apostates is a crime. Such a book would prove that Islam is a religion of peace.

Mr. Hamid, a former member of an Islamist terrorist group, is an Islamic reformer and senior fellow at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.

A Short Overview of Sharia Law

Dear Reader,

This is a must read article, and I don’t want you to miss it so please click:

A Short Overview of Sharia Law

Please leave your comments on the new blog.  Thank you for your patience while I transition to my new No Compromise blog

Kindest regards,

~No Compromise

Dutch Courage

by –Mark Steyn

Mark Steyn won his own battle last year against Orwellian “Hate” Police, in his case, masquerading as the Canadian Human Rights Commission after “human rights” complaints were filed by the Canadian Islamic Congress regarding Steyn’s alleged “hateful” writing about the facts of Islam.  Thankfully, enough word got out worldwide about these PC clowns trying to destroy the accused via “hate speech violations” without due process, that these Kangaroo Courts eventually backed down.  [Research is still underway to determine which of the aforementioned PC Police monikers are perfect oxymorons – or merely perfect morons..]

Mark Steyn is also author of the brilliant, yet profoundly chilling, book America Alone which makes clear the stunning realization that civilizational demographics alone will soon transform the human face of our planet.  He deftly proves and warns that “Eurabia” – a continent dominated by Islam – is inevitable and imminent.


Conservative Canadian!

Conservative Canadian!

Last year, The New York Times ran a story (front page, above the fold, gosh) on my troubles with the Canadian “thought police”, at the end of which I’m quoted as follows:

Western governments are becoming increasingly comfortable with the regulation of opinion. The First Amendment really does distinguish the U.S., not just from Canada but from the rest of the Western world.

The latest jurisdiction to get way too “comfortable with the regulation of opinion” is the Netherlands. As Andrew noted below, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal has ordered prosecutors to put the politician and film-maker Geert Wilders on trial for “making anti-Islamic statements”.

The Dutch, like the Canadians, think they can maintain social peace by shriveling the bounds of public discourse and bringing what little remains under state regulation. But one notices that the coercive urge, which comes so naturally to Euro-progressives, only goes in one direction. The Swedish Chancellor of Justice shuts down the investigation into the Grand Mosque of Stockholm for selling tapes urging believers to kill “the brothers of pigs and apes” (ie, Jews) because that’s simply “the everyday climate in the rhetoric”. The masked men marching through the streets of London with placards threatening to rain down another 9/11 on the infidels are protected by a phalanx of Metropolitan Police officers. The PC nellies of the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission, happy to hound the last neo-Nazi in Saskatchewan posting to the Internet from his mum’s basement, won’t go anywhere near Abou Hammaad Sulaiman Dameus al-Hayitia, the big-time Montreal imam whose book says infidels are “evil people”, Jews “spread corruption and chaos”, and homosexuals should be “exterminated”.

Instead, the state’s response to explicit Islamic intimidation is to punish those foolish enough to point out that intimidation. You don’t have to be as intemperate as Minheer Wilders can sometimes be: In the Netherlands even the most innocuous statement can get you into trouble. To express his disgust at Theo van Gogh’s murder, the artist Chris Ripke put up a mural outside his studio showing an angel and the words “Thou shalt not kill”. But the cops thought this was somehow a dig at the local mosque and so came round, destroyed the mural, arrested the TV news crew filming it, and wiped their tape. The Dutch have determined to commit societal euthanasia, and dislike fellows pointing out it might not be as painless as they’ve assumed.

by –Michael Bresciani, www.renewamerica.us

Obama Documentation Activists – Not Conspiracy Theorists

What's Happening to our Rule of Law?

What's Happening to our Rule of Law?

A theorist is someone who holds and expounds a theory. Often the elements of the theory are expostulated on things that may never be known. Was there another shooter on the grassy knoll, where is Osama Bin Laden? Those trying to vet Obama even post inaugural are not trying to prove a theory, here is why.

Most of those filing law suits to subpoena Obama’s documents are lawyers, politicians and military people none who have ever been known to be conspiracy theorists on any subject. The attempt to put them in the same class with those who chase UFO sightings or those who are still looking for the Holy Grail is demeaning and ridiculous.

Questions about the body of Hitler, the whereabouts of Osama and how many shooters were on the grassy knoll and other conspiracy questions all have one thing in common; they are speculative and nearly un-answerable. Bringing a birth certificate or school records up out of a vault does not require a bit of speculation. All that’s needed is a subpoena not a theory. Producing a document is in no way comparable to proving a theory.

The birth certificate in question is only one document that is conspicuously missing from Barack Obama’s past. The list of documents is huge and it is one of the reasons all of them have been sought by various lawyers and interested parties.

Article II of the Constitution says “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Those refusing to produce the requested documents are turning up their noses to the Constitution, to “we the people” and calling them “conspiracy theorists” will by no means make the question go away.

The premise of all the pending lawsuits is uniform and consistent even if they are poorly understood. The most common mistake is to see it as a few discontented people who don’t like Barack Obama or who just can’t handle the results of the election. It is true that this small but rapidly growing body of questioners think they have been victims of a fraud but the truth is that if what they are trying to show us has even an ounce of truth to it then 305,000,000 Americans have been subject to the fraud.

Neither the inauguration nor the crowds chanting “Obama” on the concourse will deter those who are determined to know the truth. After all even Jesus had people throwing palm branches in front of him one day and crowds crying out for his crucifixion the next. Many of those who called for Christ’s death were no doubt the same ones who only the day before hailed him as their King. While Barack Obama may have the next four to eight years to sit in the oval office he may have no more than Andy Warhol’s fifteen minutes of fame like everyone else on this planet.

It is the more obvious contradictions to the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution that has most of us worried about Obama’s plans for America. His willingness to sign FOCA (freedom of choice act) into law would allow an abortion at any time during a pregnancy. That would nullify the “right to life” part of the Declaration and would render the “liberty and the pursuit of happiness” aspect of the Declaration a total impossibility. Isn’t it a contradiction to say “all men are created equal” without including the unborn?

Continue reading

via the BBC News

A Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put a right-wing politician on trial for making anti-Islamic statements.

Alleged "Hate Criminal" Geert Wilders

Alleged "Hate Criminal" Geert Wilders

Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders made a controversial film last year equating Islam with violence and has likened the Koran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

“In a democratic system, hate speech is considered so serious that it is in the general interest to… draw a clear line,” the court in Amsterdam said.

Mr. Wilders said the judgement was an “attack on the freedom of expression”.

“Participation in the public debate has become a dangerous activity. If you give your opinion, you risk being prosecuted,” he said.

Not only he, but all Dutch citizens opposed to the “Islamisation” of their country would be on trial, Mr Wilders warned.

“Who will stand up for our culture if I am silenced?” he added.


The three judges said that they had weighed Mr Wilders’s “one-sided generalisations” against his right to free speech, and ruled that he had gone beyond the normal leeway granted to politicians.

This is a happy day for all followers of Islam who do not want to be tossed on the garbage dump of Nazism

Gerard Spong, lawyer

“The Amsterdam appeals court has ordered the prosecution of member of parliament Geert Wilders for inciting hatred and discrimination, based on comments by him in various media on Muslims and their beliefs,” the court said in a statement.

“The court also considers appropriate criminal prosecution for insulting Muslim worshippers because of comparisons between Islam and Nazism made by Wilders,” it added.

Anti-Jihad Jihadist

Anti-Jihad Jihadist

The court’s ruling reverses a decision last year by the public prosecutor’s office, which said Mr Wilders’s comments had been made outside parliament as a contribution to the debate on Islam in Dutch society and that no criminal offence had been committed.

Prosecutors said on Wednesday that they could not appeal against the judgement and would open an investigation immediately.

Gerard Spong, a prominent lawyer who pushed for Mr Wilders’s prosecution, welcomed the court’s decision.

“This is a happy day for all followers of Islam who do not want to be tossed on the garbage dump of Nazism,” he told reporters.

Continue reading

by John Perazzo

Black Muslim lawyer Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour

Black Muslim lawyer Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour

Black Muslim lawyer Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour recently made news when it was revealed that he was a patron of Barack Obama[1] and recommended him for admission to Harvard Law School in 1988. Back in the 1960s, al-Mansour, whose “slave name” was then Don Warden, was deeply involved in Bay Area racial politics as founder of a group called the African American Association. A close personal adviser to Huey Newton[2] and Bobby Seale, al-Mansour helped the pair establish the Black Panther Party[3] but later broke with them when they entered coalitions with white radical groups. After becoming a Muslim, al-Mansour found not only an ideological justification for his racism but also a political purpose. That was, in the words of a memorandum[4] produced by the Muslim Brotherhood[5] and seized by the FBI as part of its probe of the Holy Land Foundation,[6] to “eliminate and destroy the Western civilization from within.” Many black racists like al-Mansour are key figures in this “stealth” jihad, whose prime recruiting grounds are the U.S. prisons and mosques where inmates and worshippers alike are taught to embrace a radical Islam engaged in an apocalyptic battle against America.

Al-Mansour met Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal in the mid-1970s and formed a relationship that led to al-Mansour’s hiring as attorney to King Saud. He has since been an adviser to Saudi billionaires who fund the stealth jihad and spread Wahhabi extremism in America.

Continue reading

They Are Killing Christians. Who Cares?

by Bill Warner

In Mosul, Iraq, the Muslims are threatening and killing Christians. Now this is under the occupation of America. Have you noticed the Christian George Bush and any other leader being outraged and speaking out? Our leaders have no basis to speak from. The political dogma about Islam is to never study its history, so every event about Islam comes without a historical reference. The historical dots are never connected; hence, leadership wakes up every morning in a new world without any memory.

The ignorance is profound–

The Rev. Bolis Jacob, of Mosul’s Mar Afram Church, told AP he couldn’t understand the attacks.

“We respect the Islamic religion and the Muslim clerics,” he said. “We don’t know under what religion’s pretexts these terrorists work.”

This Christian lives in Iraq, a Christian nation 1400 years ago, one of the oldest Christian communities in the world. Today Iraq is about 2% Christian. Even a modern political or religious leader can tell a drop from 100% to 2%. The drop is called annihilation. How far will it go? Let’s look at another annihilation in Iraq.

The oldest Jewish community in the world is in Iraq. The Jews of Iraq go back to the Babylonian captivity. Today there are fewer than 20 Jews in Iraq. They are old and have no children. In about 10 years there will be no Jews in Iraq.

Political Islam is a ratchet; its power increases and never falls back. Translation: there will never be an increase in the numbers of Jews or Christians in Iraq. Their numbers will only get smaller until total annihilation.

So that is the political history that is behind the killing of Christians in Mosul. The beauty of Islam is how completely its history (actions) and doctrine align. Political Islam is the world’s most logical political system. It adapts, but never varies its grand strategy—annihilation of all kafir civilizations.

Continue reading